Petitioner sought leave to withdraw its writ petition. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn and disposed of the withdrawal application, cancelling the next hearing date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~59
VSM TOWNSHIP INDIA PVT. LTD
......Petitioner
Through: Mr. Gautam Jain, Mr. Shantanu Jain and Mr. Manish Yadav, Advs.
versus
INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 26(3), DELHI & ANR.
.....Respondents
Through: Mr. Puneet Rai, SSC with Mr. Ashwani Kumar, Mr. Rishabh Nangia and Mr. Gibran, JSCs and Mr. Nikhil Jain, Ms. Srishti Sharma and Mr. Pratham Aggarwal, Advs.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR
O R D E R % 04.09.2025
CM APPL. 55923/2025
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/09/2025 at 12:25:35
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
VINOD KUMAR, J
SEPTEMBER 4, 2025 cd
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/09/2025 at 12:25:35
VSM Township India Pvt. Ltd
Income Tax Officer Ward 26(3), Delhi
V. KAMESWAR RAO
VINOD KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
