Writ petitioners sought permission to withdraw with liberty to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal; the Delhi High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn with that liberty.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~73
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
versus EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sholk Chandra, SC for ESIC with Mr. Sankalp Sharma. Mr. Bhaskar Kumar, Advocate for ESIC. Mr. Sahil Munjal, Ms. Rhea Gandhi, Mr. Shubham Goyal, Advocates for R-2.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN O R D E R
% 06.03.2025
After some hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal.
The writ petition, alongwith pending application, is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid.
PRATEEK JALAN, J
MARCH 6, 2025 “Bhupi”/SD/
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/03/2025 at 12:27:28
GOPIKA KRISHNAN B G & ORS.
EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION
R-2
PRATEEK JALAN
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
