Partly allowed

Devender Kumar v. Smt. Ram Kaur (Deceased) through Legal Heir Smt. Satya Prakashi

Delhi HC16 Sept 2025C.R.P./262/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order addresses three matters: an application for withdrawal of certified copies allowed with conditions; another for condonation of delay in filing a revision petition permitted; and the main revision petition under Section 115 CPC, which was withdrawn by the petitioner and dismissed.

What did the court decide?

Exemption from filing certified copies allowed; condonation of 145 days delay granted; main petition dismissed as withdrawn.

Devender Kumar Vs Smt. Ram Kaur (Deceased) through Legal… — Specific Performance | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~60

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.R.P. 262/2025 & CM APPL. 58714-58716/2025 DEVENDER KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Amith, Mr. R. S. Bhatia, Advs.

¶3

versus

¶4

SMT. RAM KAUR (DECEASED) THROUGH LEGAL HEIR SMT. SATYA PRAKASHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Naveen Kumar Goyal and Ms. Ritika Goyal, Advs.

¶5

CORAM:

¶6

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU

¶7

O R D E R % 16.09.2025

¶8

CM APPL. 58716/2025 [Exemption from filing certified copies]

¶9

Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

¶10

The Application stands disposed of.

¶11

CM APPL. 58714/2025 [Condonation of delay]

¶12

This is an Application filed on behalf of the Petitioner seeking condonation of delay of 145 days in filing the present Petition.

¶13

Learned Counsel for Respondent submits that he has no objection if the prayer in the present Application is allowed.

¶14

Accordingly, and for the reasons as stated in the Application, the delay is condoned.

¶15

The Application stands disposed of.

¶16

C.R.P. 262/2025 & CM APPL. 58715/2025 [Stay]

¶17

The present Petition has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [hereinafter referred to as “CPC”] against the judgment and decree dated 27.11.2024 passed by learned

¶18

This is a digitally signed order.

¶19

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/09/2025 at 12:13:03

¶20

District Judge, East District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi [hereinafter referred to as “Impugned Judgment”]. By the Impugned Judgment, a suit filed by the Respondent/Plaintiff under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 has been decreed.

¶21

After some arguments, learned Counsel for the Petitioner seeks and is granted liberty of the Court to withdraw the present Petition.

¶22

The Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. The pending Application also stands closed.

¶23

The parties will act based on the digitally signed copy of the order.

¶24

TARA VITASTA GANJU, J

¶25

SEPTEMBER 16, 2025/ r

¶26

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/09/2025 at 12:13:03

Devender Kumar v. Smt. Ram Kaur (Deceased) through Legal Heir Smt. Satya Prakashi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Devender Kumar v. Smt. Ram Kaur (Deceased) through Legal Heir Smt. Satya Prakashi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Amazon Distributors (P) Ltd. Vs Gopal Bhardwaj

M/S Amazon Distributors (P) Ltd. Vs Bhuwan Chand Joshi

M/S Amazon Distributors (P) Ltd. Vs Hari Kishan

Ms S.S. Enterprise Vs Sh. Gurdas Singh

Rashid Ali Vs Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors.

Rahul Tyagi Vs Kamlesh and Ors.