Dinesh Kumar v. Pdj(E) Karkardooma Court , Delhi & Ors.
Delhi HCW.P.(C)/258/2025
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The petitioner’s counsel sought further time to take instructions. The Court granted time and listed the matter on 29.05.2025 in the category of supplementary matters.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~14
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- W.P.(C) 258/2025 and CM APPL.22491/2025
¶4
DINESH KUMAR .....Petitioner
¶5
Through: Mr. Dinesh Kumar, Advocate.
¶6
- versus
¶7
PDJ(E) KARKARDOOMA COURT , DELHI & ORS.
¶8
.....Respondents Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Adv. for GNCTD. Mr. T. Singhdev and Mr. Tanishq Srivastava, Advocates for R3.
¶9
CORAM:
¶10
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA
¶11
O R D E R % 13.05.2025
¶12
- Learned counsel appearing for respondent no.1 and GNCTD, seeks some further time to take instructions.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Dinesh Kumar
- respondent
PDJ(E) Karkadoma Court, Delhi
Coram
AI extract
Sachin Datta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court