Disposed

MD College of Education v. National Council for Teacher Education & Anr.

Delhi HC10 Mar 2025W.P.(C)/2248/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Delhi High Court directed the respondent authority to decide a pending application regarding M.Ed. course inspection within two months, ensuring due process including an inspection, without expressing an opinion on the merits of the claim.

What did the court decide?

Directing respondents to decide the pending application within two months and conduct inspection.

MD College of Education Vs National Council for… — Education and Admissions | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~5

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 2248/2025

¶4

MD COLLEGE OF EDUCATION .....Petitioner Through: Mr.Rishabh Kumar and Mr.Keshav Sharma, Advocates

¶5

versus

¶6

NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ANR.

¶7

.....Respondents Through: Mr. N.K. Bhatnagar and Mr. Arkam Khan, Advocates for NCTE (Through VC)

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA

¶10

O R D E R

¶11

% 10.03.2025

¶12

CM APPL. 10619/2025 (Exemption)

¶13

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶14

The application stands disposed of.

¶15

W.P.(C) 2248/2025

¶16

The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking the following reliefs:-

¶17

“a) Issue a writ mandamus or any other suitable writ, order or direction directing the respondents to conduct inspection and consider the representation dated 20.12.2024 of petitioner institution for M.ED course for academic session 2025-2026.

¶18

b) Pass any other order (s) / directions as this Hon 'ble court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.”

¶19

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 18:31:25

¶20

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner states that the application dated 20.12.2024 filed previously by the petitioner, which is pending before the respondents, has not been decided yet.

¶21

Issue notice. Learned counsel for the respondents accepts notice. He does not dispute the fact that the application of the petitioner is still pending for consideration.

¶22

Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, the respondents are directed to decide the pending application dated 20.12.2024 within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this order. It is further directed that the respondents shall follow due process including conducting of inspection of the petitionerInstitution for M.Ed. Course from academic session 2025-06.

¶23

It is open for the respondents to call for any information, if necessary, in deciding the request of the petitioner-institution.

¶24

Needless to state, this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the claim of the petitioner, and therefore, in case the petitioner is aggrieved by any order passed by the respondents, it will be open for the petitioner to seek legal recourse as permissible in law.

¶25

No further relief is prayed for, at this stage.

¶26

In view of the above, the present writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of.

¶27

DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J

¶28

MARCH 10, 2025/ Dy/na..

¶29

MD College of Education v. National Council for Teacher Education & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

MD College of Education v. National Council for Teacher Education & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Deepshikha Overseas Pvt. Ltd. Vs Goods and Service Tax Officer Ward - 92 & Anr.

Ganesh Trading Company Vs Superintendent Range 27 Central GST Division New Delhi & Anr.

Mr. Rohit Hans and Anr. Vs Directorate General of Civil Aviation and Anr.

Smita Jindal Vs Commissioner of Cental Goods and Service Tax (Cgst), Delhi West

M/S Fone O Clock, through Its Partner, Sh. Paras Sareen Vs Commissioner of Customs-Preventive, New Custom House New Delhi & Anr.

Indianeye Security Private Limited Vs Sh Nawab Ali & Anr.

Swayam Sidha Residents Welfare Association through Its President/ General Secretary Jagdish Prasad Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi through Its Commissioner & Ors.

State Bank of India Vs M/S Pp Jewellers Private Limited

Airports Authority of India Vs Mumbai International Airport Limited & Anr.

Shashank Yadav Vs Gnct of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Airports Authority of India Vs Delhi International Airport Limited & Anr.

Gyanodaya College of Education & Anr. Vs National Council for Teacher Education & Anr.

Master Anas Akhtar Vs B R Mehta Vb Anguridevi Shersingh Memorial & Ors.

Aftab Alam Vs University Grant Commission & Anr.