Dismissed¶18

Renu Kumar Singh and Anr. v. Nandini Kumar

Delhi HC21 Aug 2025C.R.P./223/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

C.R.P. 223/2025, Delhi High Court, Justice Tara Vitasta Ganju, 21.08.2025; revision under Section 115 CPC against dismissal of Order VII Rule 11 (b) and (c) application; petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach Trial Court; stay application CM APPL. 46399/2025 closed; exemption application CM APPL. 46400/2025 allowed; no findings on merits.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to withdraw the Petition, with liberty to the Petitioners to agitate their contentions before the learned Trial Court; pending applications closed. ¶18

Renu Kumar Singh and Anr. Vs Nandini Kumar — Delhi HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~6

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- C.R.P. 223/2025 & CM APPL. 46399-46400/2025

¶4

RENU KUMAR SINGH AND ANR .....Petitioners

¶5

Through: Mr. Deepak Khosla, Advocate.

¶6

versus

¶7

NANDINI KUMAR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Advocate.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU

¶10

CM APPL. 46400/2025 [Exemption from filing certified/typed copies]

¶11

Allowed, subject to the Petitioners filing certified/typed copies of the annexures within a period of three weeks.

¶12

The Application stands disposed of.

¶13

C.R.P. 223/2025 & CM APPL. 46399/2025 [Stay]

¶14

The present Petition has been filed on behalf of the Petitioners under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [hereinafter referred to as <CPC=] against the order dated 28.05.2025 passed by learned District Judge04, South District, Saket Courts, New Delhi [hereinafter referred to as <Impugned Order=]. By the Impugned Order, an Application under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC filed by the Petitioners has been dismissed by the learned Trial Court. The Application that was filed by the Petitioners is under Order VII Rule 11 (b) and (c) of the CPC.

¶15

This is a digitally signed order.

¶16

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/08/2025 at 11:55:06

¶17

After some arguments, learned Counsel for the Petitioners seeks and is granted permission to withdraw the present Petition with liberty to agitate his contentions before the learned Trial Court.

¶18

The Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. The pending Applications also stands closed.

¶19

The parties shall act based on the digitally signed copy of the order.

¶20

TARA VITASTA GANJU, J

¶21

AUGUST 21, 2025/ ha

¶22

This is a digitally signed order.

¶23

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/08/2025 at 11:55:06

Renu Kumar Singh and Anr. v. Nandini Kumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Renu Kumar Singh and Anr. v. Nandini Kumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajinder Sethi Vs Vishal Gupta

Ms Preeti & Anr. Vs Ankit Bhardwaj & Ors.

Ram Karan Vs Adarsh Yadav

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs Sh Ved Prakash Aggarwal and Ors.

Sudhir Kumar Sangar Vs Icici Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd. & Ors.

National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Seeta Devi and Ors.