Dismissed

Rajinder Sethi v. Vishal Gupta

Delhi HC20 Aug 2025C.R.P./218/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Delhi disposed of three connected applications: exempting the petitioner from filing dim annexures subject to compliance, condoning a two-day delay, and dismissing a revision petition filed under Section 115 CPC as a withdrawal. Liberty was granted to raise objections in the trial court.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted liberty to file legible copies of dim annexures within two weeks; delay condoned; petition dismissed as withdrawn.

Rajinder Sethi Vs Vishal Gupta — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~5

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- C.R.P. 218/2025, CM APPLs. 45146-48/2025

¶4

RAJINDER SETHI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajat Bhardwaj, Ms. Ankita M. Bhardwaj, Mr. Saurav Kakroda and Mr. Kaustubh Khanna, Advocates

¶5

versus

¶6

VISHAL GUPTA .....Respondent

¶7

Through:

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU

¶10

CM APPL. 45148/2025 [Exemption from filing certified copy, fair typed copy of the dim annexures]

¶11

Allowed, subject to the Petitioner filing legible copies of dim annexures within a period of two weeks.

¶12

CM APPL. 45146/2025 [Condonation of delay]

¶13

This is an Application filed on behalf of the Petitioner seeking condonation of delay of 2 days in filing the present Petition.

¶14

For the reasons as stated in the Application, the delay is condoned.

¶15

The Application stands disposed of.

¶16

C.R.P. 218/2025, CM APPL. 45147/2025 [Stay]

¶17

The present Petition has been filed by the Petitioner on behalf of Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 seeking to impugn the Order dated 02.04.2025 passed by the learned District Judge-03, North West

¶18

This is a digitally signed order.

¶19

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/08/2025 at 11:55:15

¶20

District, Rohini Courts, New Delhi [hereinafter referred to as “Impugned Order”]. By the Impugned Order, the Application filed by the Petitioner/Defendant under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC has been dismissed.

¶21

After some arguments, learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner seeks liberty to withdraw the present Petition.

¶22

The Petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. All pending Applications stand closed.

¶23

It is, however, clarified that the Petitioner is permitted to take all objection raised before this Court, before the Trial Court during his defence. 9. All the rights and contentions of both the parties are left open to be agitated before the learned Trial Court.

¶24

TARA VITASTA GANJU, J

¶25

AUGUST 20, 2025 g.joshi

¶26

This is a digitally signed order.

¶27

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/08/2025 at 11:55:15

Rajinder Sethi v. Vishal Gupta

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajinder Sethi v. Vishal Gupta

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Management of East Delhi Municipal Corporation , through Its Commissioner Vs Shri Pankaj S/O Late Shri Sohan Lal, through Municipal Employee Union

Overseas Infrastructure Alliance India Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs Sanjay Kumar

M/S Mithaas Sweets and Restaurant Private Limited Vs M/S Lakhi Ram Deepak Kumar

Ms Preeti & Anr. Vs Ankit Bhardwaj & Ors.

Ram Karan Vs Adarsh Yadav

Renu Kumar Singh and Anr. Vs Nandini Kumar