Writ petition withdrawn by petitioners' counsel, who sought liberty to file a fresh petition with complete and correct particulars, respondents pointing out serious errors in the memo of parties and petitioner addresses.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~167
Through: Mr. Raghavendra Mohan Bajaj, Advocate.
versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Kritika Gupta and Ms. Vidhushi Singhania, Advocates for R-1/DDA.
Mr. Anuj Chaturvedi, Advocate for R-2/DUSIB. Ms. Anjana Gosain, Ms. Shreya M. and Ms. Akansha Choudhary, Advocates for R-3/ECI.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH
% 03.12.2025
JYOTI SINGH, J
DECEMBER 3, 2025/ RW
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/12/2025 at 13:00:02
Ganesh Kumar & Anr.
Delhi Development Authority
DUSIB
ECI
Jyoti Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
