Writ petition withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to approach the jurisdictional High Court; Delhi High Court granted liberty, dismissed the petition as withdrawn without expressing any view on the merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Neeraj (SPC), Mr. Vedansh Anand (GP), Mr. Sachin Saraswat, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA O R D E R % 08.01.2025
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file the present petition before the concerned Jurisdictional High Court and to take appropriate steps in accordance with law.
Liberty granted.
In view of the submissions made, the present petition along with pending application stands dismissed as withdrawn. However, it is made clear that this court has not gone into the merits of the case and no expression made herein shall tantamount to be an expression on the merits of the case.
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J
JANUARY 8, 2025/AR/KR..
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 22:25:11
VIKAS
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Dinesh Kumar Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
