Petitioners sought withdrawal of the writ petition citing technical defects, with liberty to file afresh. The court granted liberty and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Liberty to file afresh granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~6
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA O R D E R
% 08.01.2025
Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present petition due to some technical defects therein with liberty to file afresh.
Liberty granted.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J
JANUARY 8, 2025/ Dy/kr
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 20:30:37
AATIF ALI LARI & ORS.
NATIONAL BOARD OF EXAMINATION IN MEDICAL SCIENCES & ORS.
Dinesh Kumar Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
