Writ petition against Uber India withdrawn by the petitioner following a settlement between the parties; the court dismissed the petition and the early-hearing application as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~173
versus
UBER INDIA TECHNOLOGY PRIVATE LIMITED (UBER) & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shashank Mishra, Ms. Swati Agarwal, Ms. Shivika Mattoo and Mr. Vibhu Pahuja, Advs. for R-1.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA
O R D E R % 16.04.2025
W.P.(C) 18010/2024 & CM APPL.21721/2025 (early hearing)
W.P.(C) 18010/2024
SACHIN DATTA, J
APRIL 16, 2025/ cl
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/04/2025 at 14:55:11
Rahul Bajaj
Uber India Technology Private Limited (Uber)
Sachin Datta
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
