Dismissed¶19

M/S Axor Gold Trading Fze v. Commissioner of Customs

Delhi HC17 Apr 2025W.P.(C)/16913/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Axor Gold Trading FZE; Union of India & Ors; Commissioner of Customs; Delhi High Court; W.P.(C) 8292/2016; W.P.(C) 16913/2022; Article 226 Constitution of India; return of seized goods; panchnama/seizure memo dated 19.04.2015; customs seizure; noticee Mohd. Quamruzzamma / Mohd. Qumaruzumma; withdrawal of writ petition; dismissed as withdrawn with liberty; legal remedies if documents become available; Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta; order dated 17.04.2025.

What did the court decide?

Both petitions dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for, i.e., liberty to avail legal remedies in accordance with law if documents become available in the future. ¶19

M/S Axor Gold Trading Fze Vs Commissioner of Customs — Writ and Judicial Review | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~19 & 20

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 8292/2016 & CM APPL. 36367/2016

¶4

M/S AXOR GOLD TRADING FZE .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: versus	Mr. Prak (M:	Rahul Raheja, Mr. ash and Mr. Rohit Raheja 9811216445)	Gaurav , Advs.
UNION OF INDIA & ORS		.....Respondents
Through:	Mr. Stan Sara (M: Mr. with	Akshay Amritanshu, ding Counsel CBIC, Ms. f & Ms. Pragya Upadhyay 9931282222) Bhagwan Swarup Shukla Mr. Sunita Shukla, Adv.	Senior Drishti , Advs. , CGSC
20 And
+ W.P.(C) 1	6913/2	022
M/S AXOR GOLD TRADIN	G FZE	.....Petition	er
Through:	Mr.	Rahul Raheja, Mr.	Gaurav
versus COMMISSIONER OF CUST	Prak OMS	ash and Mr. Rohit Raheja, .....Respond	Advs. ent
Through:	Mr.	Akshay Amritanshu,	Senior
	Stan Sara	ding Counsel CBIC, Ms. f & Ms. Pragya Upadhyay	Drishti , Advs.

¶6

CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA

¶7

O R D E R

¶8

% 17.04.2025

¶9

This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

¶10

The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner under Article 226

¶11

of the Constitution of India inter alia seeking to direct the Respondent nos.2 and 3 to return the goods as mentioned in the panchnama /seizure memo dated

¶12

This is a digitally signed order.

¶13

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/04/2025 at 11:56:47

¶14

19th April, 2015 to the Petitioner.

¶15

On the last date i.e., 4th March, 2025, the Court had observed as under: “6. Here, the Court notices that repeated adjournments have been granted to the Petitioner to show the connection between the Petitioner and the noticee – Mohd. Qumaruzumma, however, no documents have been filed since 2023 onwards.

¶16

7. Accordingly, list on 17th April, 2025. 8. However, it is clarified that this shall be the last opportunity given to the Petitioner to take steps, failing which, the Court would proceed on the next date of hearing.”

¶17

Today, ld. Counsel for the Petitioner wishes to withdraw both these petitions on the ground that the Petitioner has not been able to bring any documents to show the relationship between the Petitioner and Mohd. Quamruzzamma.

¶18

However he submits that he should be permitted to avail of his legal remedies, if some documents become available in the future.

¶19

Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for, which can be availed of, in accordance with law.

¶20

PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J

¶21

RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J

¶22

APRIL 17, 2025 dj/ar

¶23

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/04/2025 at 11:56:47

M/S Axor Gold Trading Fze v. Commissioner of Customs

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Axor Gold Trading Fze v. Commissioner of Customs

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Devender Kumar Tyagi & Anr. Vs Divisional Commissioner & Ors.

Ram Dev Singh Yadav Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi and Others

Harshi Uppal Vs Assessment Unit Income Tax Department Delhi & Anr.

Gdr Finance and Leasing Private Limited Vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax, Centrl CIRCLE-25, Delhi & Ors.

Gsr Infocom Pvt. Ltd. Vs Goods and Services Tax Officer Ward 103 Delhi & Ors.

Puran Store through Its Partner Hari Ram Agarwal Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 43 - 1 & Ors.

Mamta Goyal Vs Punjab National Bank & Anr.

Shri Atul Aggarwal Vs Union of India & Ors.

Vibhor Marketing Pvt. Ltd. Vs Sales Tax Officer Class Ii, Avato, Ward 83, Delhi & Anr.

M/S Perfetti Van Melle India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Additional Commissioner (Adjn.) Cgst Delhi North & Ors.

Ms Blackmelon Advance Technology Company Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of State Goods and Services Tax Delhi & Anr.

Shivnandan Kumar Bajaj Vs Principal Commissioner of Customs (Import)

Techno Canada Inc. Vs Union of India & Ors.

M/S Prince Diamond Jewellers Private Limited Vs Goods and Service Tax Officer, Delhi Department of Trade and Taxes, Government of NCT of Delhi & a