Disposed

Suresh Gaur v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Delhi HC6 Feb 2025W.P.(C)/180/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This dismissal-oriented order rejects a writ petition challenging stopgap medical appointments in Delhi government hospitals. The court notes litigation has resolved service control issues. The petition was not entertained due to the temporary nature of the appointments, with a direction to fill the posts regularly.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition not entertained; direction to Government of NCT of Delhi to fill posts by making regular appointments.

Suresh Gaur Vs Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors. — Service and Employment | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~18

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 180/2024 & CM APPL. 833/2024

¶4

SURESH GAUR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Avadh Bihari Kaushik, Mr. Prateek Goyal and Mr. Rishabh Kumar, Advs.

¶5

versus

¶6

GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Nitesh Kumar Singh, Ms.Laavanya Kaushik and Ms.Aliza Alam, Advs for GNCTD.Z Mr.Abhay Kumar, Mr.Vineet Kumar Singh, Mr.Shagun Ruhil and Mr.Karan Chopra, Advs for R-10.

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA

¶9

O R D E R % 06.02.2025

¶10

Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Ms. Laavanya Kaushik, learned counsel representing Government of NCT of Delhi and Mr. Abhay Kumar, learned counsel representing respondent no. 10.

¶11

By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, a writ of Quo Warranto has been sought against respondent no. 8, 9, 10 and 11, who presently are holding the posts of Medical Director at Burari Hospital, Medical Director at Deen Dayal Upadhyay Hospital, Medical Superintendent at Maharishi Valmiki Hospital and Medical

¶12

This is a digitally signed order.

¶13

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/02/2025 at 17:37:03

¶14

Superintendent at Satyawadi Raja Harish Chandra Hospital, respectively, run by the Government of NCT of Delhi.

¶15

It has been argued by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that all said appointments have been made contrary to the rules, as a result of which, the eligible incumbents in the service are not being promoted. However, learned counsel representing the Government of NCT of Delhi has submitted that the appointments were not made in regular capacity, rather all these incumbents were appointed in stopgap arrangement and were given charge of their respective posts, considering the exigencies of the situation.

¶16

We have also been informed that against these appointments, the salary applicable to the posts being presently occupied by these incumbents has not been paid; rather they have been drawing the salary of their substantive posts.

¶17

On a query made, learned counsel representing the Government of NCT of Delhi, informs the Court that on account of some litigation, as to the control of services under the Government of NCT of Delhi, regular selection for the aforesaid posts could not be made. She, however, states that now the said issue has been resolved by means of a judgment passed by the Supreme Court in Government of NCT of Delhi v. Union of India , Civil appeal No.2357/2017 , dated 11.05.2023.

¶18

In view of the aforesaid, since the posting of respondent nos. 8 to 11 has been made only as a stopgap arrangement, temporarily, as such, we are not inclined to entertain this writ petition.

¶19

Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of with the direction to the Government of NCT of Delhi to take appropriate steps for filling up of

¶20

This is a digitally signed order.

¶21

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/02/2025 at 17:37:03

¶22

the aforesaid posts by way of making regular appointments.

¶23

The said exercise of making regular appointments shall be completed by the Government of NCT of Delhi as early as possible.

¶24

DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ

¶25

TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J

¶26

FEBRUARY 6, 2025/MJ

¶27

This is a digitally signed order.

¶28

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/02/2025 at 17:37:03

Suresh Gaur v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suresh Gaur v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Avinash Kumar Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 28, Delhi & Anr.

Raj Polybags Private Limited Vs Income Tax Officer Ward 21(1) & Ors.

Ramayana Ispat Pvt. Ltd. Vs Acit, Cir 19(1), Delhi & Anr.

Pratt and Whitney Canada Sea Pte Ltd. Vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr.

M/S Indian Steel Corporation Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-I

The Motor & General Finance Ltd. Vs New Delhi Municipal Council

Manjit Walia through Spa Sachin Walia Vs Delhi Development Authority

Sonia Vs Union of India & Anr.

Nokia India Private Limited Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr.

Anshu Sagar Kalra Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr.

Forever Exim India Private Limited Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 30 Delhi & Anr.

Laxmi Narayan Vs Government NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Renewflex Recycling Vs Facilitation Centre Rohini Courts & Ors.

Sultanpur Estate Residents Association Vs Government of NCT of Delhi