Allowed

Forever Exim India Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 30 Delhi & Anr.

Delhi HC4 Feb 2025W.P.(C)/1043/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition challenged a Section 148 reopening notice for AY 2015-16 issued after the six-year limitation period had expired on 31.03.2022. Relying on Manju Somani and Rajeev Bansal, with revenue counsel concurring, the court held the notice time-barred and set it aside.

What did the court decide?

Impugned Section 148 notice dated 30.08.2024 for AY 2015-16 set aside as barred by limitation; petition allowed, pending applications disposed of.

Forever Exim India Private Limited Vs Assistant Commissioner of… — Income Tax | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~6

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 1043/2025, CM APPL. 5144/2025 & CM APPL. 5145/2025

¶4

FOREVER EXIM INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Mani Bhadra Jain and Mr. Pranav Yadav, Advocates.

¶6

versus

¶7

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE 30 DELHI & ANR` .....Respondents

¶8

Through: Mr. Anurag Ojha, SSC with Ms. Hemlata Rawat and Mr. V.K. Saksena, JSCs.

¶9

CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA

¶10

O R D E R % 04.02.2025

¶11

The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia , impugning a notice dated 30.08.2024 (hereafter the impugned notice ) issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereafter the Act ) for the assessment year (AY) 2015-16.

¶12

The petitioner also impugns the notice issued under Section 148A(b) of the Act, and the order passed under Section 148A(d) of the Act prior to the issuance of the impugned notice.

¶13

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the issue stands covered by the decision of this Court in Manju Somani v. Income Tax Officer Ward-70(1) & Ors: Neutral Citation: 2024:DHC:5411-DB.

¶14

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/02/2025 at 15:14:38

¶15

Learned counsel also referred to the decision of the Supreme Court in Union of India & Others v. Rajeev Bansal : 2024 SCC OnLine SC 2693 and drew the attention of this Court to the following passages from the said judgment:

¶16

“46. The ingredients of the proviso could be broken down for analysis as follows: (i) no notice under Section 148 of the new regime can be issued at any time for an assessment year beginning on or before 1 April 2021; (ii) if it is barred at the time when the notice is sought to be issued because of the “time limits specified under the provisions of” 149(1)(b) of the old regime. Thus, a notice could be issued under Section 148 of the new regime for assessment year 2021-2022 and before only if the time limit for issuance of such notice continued to exist under Section 149(1)(b) of the old regime.

¶17

¶18

The first proviso to Section 149(1)(b) requires the determination of whether the time limit prescribed under Section 149(1)(b) of the old regime continues to exist for the assessment year 2021-2022 and before. Resultantly, a notice under Section 148 of the new regime cannot be issued if the period of six years from the end of the relevant assessment year has expired at the time of issuance of the notice. This also ensures that the new time limit of ten years prescribed under Section 149(1)(b) of the new regime applies prospectively. For example, for the assessment year 2012-2013, the ten year period would have expired on 31 March 2023, while the six year period expired on 31 March 2019. Without the proviso to Section 149(1)(b) of the new regime, the Revenue could have had the power to reopen assessments for the year 2012-2013 if the escaped assessment amounted to Rupees fifty lakhs or more. The

¶19

This is a digitally signed order.

¶20

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/02/2025 at 15:14:38

¶21

proviso limits the retrospective operation of Section 149(1)(b) to protect the interests of the assesses.”

¶22

In the present case, the period of six years from the end of the relevant (AY) 2015-16 expired on 31.03.2022. The impugned notice has been issued thereafter, and the same is thus barred by limitation.

¶23

The learned counsel for the respondent concurs with the aforesaid view.

¶24

In view of the above, the impugned notice is set aside.

¶25

The petition is allowed in the aforesaid terms. Pending applications also stand disposed of.

¶26

DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ

¶27

TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J

¶28

FEBRUARY 4, 2025 Aj

¶29

Forever Exim India Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 30 Delhi & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Forever Exim India Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 30 Delhi & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anil Dhupar Vs Union of India through Union Minister & Ors.

Bihar Olympic Association Vs President Indian Olympic Association & Anr.

Indian Speech Language and Hearing Association Vs Union of India & Ors.

Prem Prakash Shokeen Vs Election Commision of India & Anr.

Vikas Swami Vs Union of India & Ors.

Sudha Dhawan Vs Delhi Development Authority

The Film and Television Producers Guild of India Limited Vs Competition Commission of India

Amit Kumar Vs the Commissioner of Customs

Meghna Rajendra Kumar Vs Union of India and Ors.

Sh Basuki Nath Vs Union of India & Ors.

Modern Caterers Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Nokia India Private Limited Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr.

Anshu Sagar Kalra Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr.

Sh Vijai Pratap Singh Vs Delhi High Court, through Registrar General & Anr.