Disposed¶32

Meera Goyal v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi, & Ors.

Delhi HC9 Sept 2025W.P.(C)/17596/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regularization of unauthorized construction; Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD); flat of respondent nos. 3 and 4; regularization plan and order not provided to petitioner; Appellate Tribunal MCD (ATMCD); liberty to challenge regularization in accordance with law; missing document — ATMCD to call for file from MCD; Status Report before ATMCD; prior order dated 03.09.2025; W.P.(C) 17596/2024; W.P.(C) 5060/2025; CM APPL.; Justice Mini Pushkarna; disposed of on 09.09.2025.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to the petitioner to challenge the regularization of the property in question in accordance with law; the ATMCD permitted to call for the file from the MCD in case of any missing document; the regularization plan handed over to the petitioner's counsel. ¶32

Meera Goyal Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi, & Ors. — Delhi HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~40 & 41

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 17596/2024, CM APPL. 10574/2025, CM APPL. 49324/2025 & CM APPL. 54050/2025

¶4

MEERA GOYAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Tarun Singla, Mr. Giridhar Thakur and Ms. Sudeshna Singh, Advs.

¶5

versus

¶6

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Shivani Luthra Lohiya, Ms. Ishita Soni and Ms. Pranya Madan, Advs. for R-2 (Through VC) Mr. Kapil Dutta and Mr. Siddharth Parashar, Advs. for MCD Ms. Sapna Goyal and Mr. Rajiv Goyal, in person + W.P.(C) 5060/2025, CM APPL. 28098/2025 & CM APPL. 44234/2025 SAPNA GOYAL & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Sapna Goyal and Mr. Rajiv Goyal, in person

¶7

versus

¶8

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Pritish Sabharwal, Adv. for MCD

¶9

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA

¶10

O R D E R % 09.09.2025

¶11

This Court notes that vide order dated 03^rd September, 2025, it had

¶12

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/09/2025 at 12:13:03

¶13

been noted as follows:

¶14

“xxx xxx xxx

¶15

1. It is brought to the notice of the Court that unauthorized construction existing in the flat of respondent nos. 3 and 4, has already been regularized.

¶16

2. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner in W.P.(C) 17596/2024 submits that she has not been provided with the regularization plan and order.

¶17

3. Accordingly, let regularization plan and order with respect to flat of respondent nos. 3 and 4 be brought before this Court for placing the same on record, and also for handing over to the learned counsel for petitioner.

¶18

4. Needless to state that if the petitioner in the both the petitions have any grievance against the regularization of the property of respondent nos. 3 and 4, the petitioners have remedy to challenge the same, in accordance with law.

¶19

5. Re-notify on 09th September, 2025.

¶20

xxx xxx xxx”

¶21

(Emphasis Supplied)

¶22

Today, learned counsel appearing for the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (“MCD”) has brought a regularization plan, which has been handed over to learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.

¶23

This Court notes that in the Status Report filed before the Appellate Tribunal, MCD (“ATMCD”), the MCD has stated as follows:

¶24

This is a digitally signed order.

¶25

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/09/2025 at 12:13:03

¶26

At this stage, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he has been handed over only copy of the regularization plan and no order has been provided towards the same.

¶27

The Status Report with respect to the regularization of the plot in question, is reproduced as under:

¶28

¶29

Accordingly, noting the aforesaid, the petitioner is granted liberty to challenge the regularization of the property in question, in accordance with law.

¶30

Learned counsel for the petitioner at this stage submits that in the absence of any specific order, the appeal of the petitioner shall not be heard by the ATMCD.

¶31

If that be the case, in case of any missing document, the ATMCD is at liberty to call for the file from the MCD.

¶32

With the aforesaid directions, present petition, along with the pending application, stands disposed of.

¶33

MINI PUSHKARNA, J

¶34

SEPTEMBER 9, 2025/KR

¶35

This is a digitally signed order.

¶36

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/09/2025 at 12:13:03

Meera Goyal v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi, & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Meera Goyal v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi, & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S. Smart World Communications Vs Commissioner of Central Tax and Cgst Delhi North Commissionerate

Union of India & Ors. Vs Sh Harish Chander Raheja

Indian Newspaper Society Vs Union of India & Anr.

P.M. College of Education Vs National Council for Teacher Education and Anr.

Mohd. Shafir Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors.

Shri Ghanaram Niranjan College of Pharmacy Vs Pharmacy Council of India

Gautam Properties (Delhi) Pvt. Ltd. Vs Delhi Developement Authority

Save India Foundation (Regd) Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Uma Shokeen Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Others

Sh Aman Kapasiya Vs University of Delhi & Ors.

Punjab National Bank Vs North Delhi Municipal Corporation & Ors.

Indraprastha Medical Vs South Delhi Municipal Corporation

Rajesh Mishra Vs the Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.

Abdul Nasir and Anr. Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Anr.