Dismissed¶16

Anantjain v. Delhi Development Authority

Delhi HC9 Oct 2025W.P.(C)/15491/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anantjain v. Delhi Development Authority, W.P.(C) 15491/2025 & CM APPL. Nos. 63319-20/2025, decided 09.10.2025 by Vikas Mahajan, J., High Court of Delhi. Keywords: DDA leasehold rights transfer; Plot No. 251, Pocket-1 JB, Sector-23, Rohini Residential Scheme, Delhi-110085; mandamus; FIR forgery Annexure-P/16 (complainant Prashant); superdari application dismissed 09.06.2025; disputed questions of fact; writ withdrawn with liberty to approach Civil Court. Useful for: withdrawal practice where writ raises disputed facts; no precedent value on merits.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach the Civil Court; petition and pending applications (CM APPL. Nos. 63319-20/2025) dismissed as withdrawn. ¶16

Anantjain Vs Delhi Development Authority — Delhi HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~119

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 15491/2025 & CM APPL. Nos. 63319-20/2025

¶4

ANANTJAIN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. H.S. Sharma, Adv.

¶5

versus

¶6

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY .....Respondent Through: Mr. R.K. Dhawan, Standing Counsel with Ms. Nisha Dhawan, Mr. Pawan Karan Deo and Mr. K.R. Madhar, Advs.

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN O R D E R % 09.10.2025

¶8

The present petition has been filed seeking following relief:

¶9

“a) a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ/order be issued to the respondent directing not to transfer the leasehold rights in the property bearing Plot No. 251, admeasuring 32 Sq. Mfrs. (40 Sq. Yds.), Pocket-1 JB, Sector-23, situated in the layout plan of Rohini Residential Scheme, Rohini, Delhi-110085, to anyone other person other than the petitioner.”

¶10

At the outset, Mr. R.K. Dhawan, learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of respondent/DDA on advance notice, submits that the present case involves disputed question of facts.

¶11

He invites attention of the Court to Annexure-P/16, to contend that the FIR has been registered at the instance of one Mr. Prashant alleging forgery with regard to the documents pertaining to property in question.

¶12

This is a digitally signed order.

¶13

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/10/2025 at 13:06:30

¶14

He submits that an application was filed by the petitioner for release of documents on superdari, however, the said application was dismissed vide order dated 09.06.2025.

¶15

Faced with this situation, Mr. H.S. Sharma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition with liberty to approach the Civil Court.

¶16

The petition along with pending applications is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid.

¶17

VIKAS MAHAJAN, J

¶18

OCTOBER 9, 2025 aj

¶19

This is a digitally signed order.

¶20

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/10/2025 at 13:06:30

Anantjain v. Delhi Development Authority

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anantjain v. Delhi Development Authority

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sheeraj Projects Private Limited Vs National Highways Authority of India

Sheeraj Projects Private Limited Vs National Highways Authority of India

Hari Narain Aggarwal Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi through Its Chief Secretary & Ors.

Dr. Sana Rafi Vs Jamia Millia Islamia

Enviro Tech Ventures Limited Vs Union of India & Ors.

Rajbir Singh Goyat Vs Atul Sibal and Ors.

Sumit Sharma Vs Union of India and Ors.

Vindhyachal Expressway Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India through Ministry of Road Transport and Highways & Ors.

Baby Rashi (through Her Father Mr. Vijay Karan) Vs Directorate of Education and Ors.

Master Vatsal Minor Vs Union of India & Ors.

Kulachi Hansraj Model School, through Its Principal Vs the Director, Directorate of Education

Hitesh Kumar Vs University of Delhi

Ptc College, Shree Sarswati Education Vs National Council for Teacher Education and Anr.

Nikhil Bashista Vs Delhi Development Authority through Its Vice Chairman & Ors.