Antriksh Realtech Pvt. Ltd. v. Atul Sibal and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners sought withdrawal of their writ petition after some hearing. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~22
versus
ATUL SIBAL AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Mithu Jain and Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, Advs. for R-1, 2, 5, 9 and 12. Mr. Madhurendra Kumar, Adv. (through v/c) Mr. Hardik Vashisht, Adv. for R-21. Mr. Shivinder Chopra, Adv. for R-57 (through v/c)
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA
SACHIN DATTA, J
OCTOBER 14, 2025/ cl
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/10/2025 at 14:30:38
Antriksh Realtech Pvt. Ltd.
Atul Sibal
Ors.
Sachin Datta
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court