Petitioners sought to withdraw their writ petition after some hearing. The court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn, without deciding any substantive issue.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~21
MAGAN CHAND JAIN AND ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Chinmaya Pradip Sharma, Mr. Amish Ram Dabas, Mr. Aditya Agarwal, Mr. Vijay Deora and Mr. Irfan Hasjeb, Advs.
versus
ATUL SIBAL AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Mithu Jain and Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, Advs. for R-1, 2, 5, 9 and 12. Mr. Madhurendra Kumar, Adv. (through v/c) Mr. Hardik Vashisht, Adv. for R-21. Mr. Shivinder Chopra, Adv. for R-57 (through v/c)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA O R D E R % 14.10.2025
SACHIN DATTA, J
OCTOBER 14, 2025/ cl
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/10/2025 at 14:30:38
Magan Chand Jain and Ors.
Atul Sibal and Ors.
Sachin Datta
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
