Disposed

Shyam Sunder v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Delhi HC7 May 2025W.P.(C)/13018/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition seeking action against alleged illegal call-centre use of a Patel Nagar property. MCD submitted the premises were compliant: one shop operates after paying misuse/conversion charges per MPD-2021 Clause 15.6.3, so no mis-user exists. The court disposed of the petition as satisfied on that statement.

What did the court decide?

None granted; petition disposed of as satisfied based on MCD's compliance submission.

Shyam Sunder Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi… — Municipal and Town Planning | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~60

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 13018/2023 & CM APPL. 51411/2023

¶4

SHYAM SUNDER .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. I.Ahmed, Advocate (VC)

¶6

versus

¶7

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS......Respondents Through: Mr.Shivam Sachdeva, ASC for MCD (Mob.-9971358035, [email protected]) Insp. Naveen Kumar and SI Dharmendra Sharma, P.S. Patel Nagar (Mob7013129415, [email protected])

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA

¶10

O R D E R % 07.05.2025

¶11

The present petition has been filed seeking directions to the respondents to consider the representation/complaints made by the petitioner against respondent no. 2, for misusing and running the illegal trade activity, i.e., call center in property bearing no. J-39, Ground Floor, Block-J, West Patel Nagar, New Delhi - 110008 , without obtaining valid permission and requisite license from the concerned authorities, in any manner.

¶12

The matter was kept for instructions on behalf of the learned counsel appearing for the respondent-Municipal Corporation of Delhi (“MCD”), today.

¶13

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 19:15:35

¶14

Learned counsel appearing for the respondent-MCD submits that one shop is running from the premises in question, after payment of the misuse charges. Thus, he submits that no illegal activity is being carried out from the premises in question, and there is no mis-user in the said property.

¶15

He further submits that as per the Master Plan of Delhi, 2021, (“MPD, 2021”) a shop upto 20 sq. mtrs., is allowed to be run for commercial activities, subject to the payment of conversion charges, as per Clause 15.6.3 of MPD-2021, on mixed land use. He submits that with respect to the shop in question, conversion charges have already been paid for area measuring 19 sq.mtrs. He, thus, submits that the prayer made in the present petition stands satisfied, in view of the fact that no mis-user is being carried out, from the property in question.

¶16

Considering the aforesaid statement made by the learned counsel appearing for the respondent-MCD, the present petition, alongwith the pending application, stands disposed of, as satisfied.

¶17

MINI PUSHKARNA, J

¶18

MAY 7, 2025 dy

¶19

This is a digitally signed order.

¶20

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 19:15:35

Shyam Sunder v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shyam Sunder v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Royal Trading Company Vs Union of India & Ors.

Jm Traders through Proprietor Shivam Bansal Vs Union of India & Ors.

Alaknanda Steel through Its Proprietor Mr. Rajesh Garg Vs Commissioner of Dgst & Ors.

M/S Shree Jain Polymers Vs Union of India & Anr.

M/S Nikon Finlease Pvt. Ltd. Vs Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -04, Delhi & Ors.

Sqn Ldr Swati Prakash Vs Union of India & Ors.

Mr. Vinod Sharma Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Ajay Prakash Mishra Vs the Registrar Cooperative Societies through Assistant Registrar & Anr.

Chander Chhabra Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi through Its Commissioner & Ors.

Lakshman Singhal Vs Commissioner Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors.

Seema Aggarwal Vs Bses Yamuna Power Ltd.

Indu Sharma Vs Union of India & Ors.

Monu Dhingra & Ors. Vs New Delhi Municipal Council

Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. Vs Central Electricity Regulatory Commission & Ors.