A street vendor petitioner sought intervention after a vending survey; the survey and review period had concluded, so the court declined to interfere, allowed fresh application if a new survey occurs, and disposed of the petition.
No interference granted; petitioner may reapply afresh if a new survey is conducted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~61
.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Bharat Aggarwal, Ms. Kahniya and Mr. Namrata Sharma, Advocates
versus
NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ANR.
.....Respondent Through: Mr. Sriharsha Peechara, SC with Mr. Akshat Kulshreshtha, Mr. Soumit Gangulai and Mr. Akhilesh, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL
O R D E R % 22.08.2025
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/08/2025 at 12:08:53
rendered infructuous.
NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE, J
ANISH DAYAL, J
AUGUST 22, 2025/RK/zb
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/08/2025 at 12:08:53
1 issue framed by the court
Should the Court interfere given the survey has been completed and the review period over?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Arjun Singh
New Delhi Municipal Council
Nitin Wasudeo Sambre
Anish Dayal
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
