Disposed
B.L.Patney v. D.D.A. & Ors.
Delhi HCW.P.(C)/10928/2004
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petitioners settled with respondents and were allotted a plot; the writ petition was disposed of as infructuous at counsel's request, without any substantive adjudication by the court.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~2
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- W.P.(C) 10928/2004
¶4
B.L.PATNEY .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Alok Kumar, Adv. with Mr. Kapil Dev Patney, petitioner no.1(b) versus D.D.A. & ORS. ....Respondent Through: Ms. Neha Jain, Ms. Anjali Sisodia and Mr. Shantanu Jain, Advs. for R-2 and R-3.
¶5
CORAM:
¶6
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN
¶7
O R D E R % 21.08.2025
¶8
- Mr. Alok Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner alongwith petitioner no.1(b) namely, Sh. Kapil Dev Patney has entered appearance.
¶9
- It is informed that the petitioners have arrived at settlement with the respondents and in terms of the settlement, the petitioners have already been allotted a plot.
¶10
- It is accordingly prayed that the present petition be disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.
¶11
- In view of the above, the petition is disposed of as infructous.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
B.L. Patney
- respondent
D.D.A. & ORS.
Coram
AI extract
Vikas Mahajan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court