The High Court of Delhi permitted the petitioner to appear before the Competent Authority regarding a pending representation under the Delhi Street Vending Scheme, 2019, while directing a decision communication timeline. The petition is disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~7
Through: Mr. Bharat Aggarwal and Mr. Kanhaiya, Advocates.
versus
NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ANR. .....Respondents
Through: Mr. Sriharsha Peechara, Standing Counsel with Mr. Akshat Kulshreshtha and Mr. Soumit Ganguli, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL
O R D E R % 10.10.2025
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/10/2025 at 13:09:07
NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE, J
ANISH DAYAL, J
OCTOBER 10, 2025/ ay/sk
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/10/2025 at 13:09:07
Charu
New Delhi Municipal Council & Anr.
Nitin Wasudeo Sambre
Anish Dayal
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
