Petitioner sought withdrawal of an income-tax writ petition, stating the return had been accepted and penalty dropped. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn and disposed of the pending application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~55
SANDHYA SASIDHARAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr Sachit Jolly, Senior Advocate with Mrs Mansha Anand, Mr Abhyudaya Shankar Bajpai and Mr Aditya Rathore, Advocates.
versus
INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 50(1), DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr Anurag Ojha, senior standing counsel with Ms Hemlata Rawat and Mr V.K. Saksena, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIA O R D E R % 15.04.2025
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
TEJAS KARIA, J
APRIL 15, 2025 RK Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 22:05:51
Sandhya Sasidharan
Income Tax Officer Ward 50(1), Delhi
Respondent No. 2
Vibhu Bakhru
Tejas Karia
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
