Disposed

Smt Pratibha Khatri and Anr. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Delhi HC15 Jan 2025W.P.(C)/12519/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition against rejection of a leasehold-to-freehold conversion application for an industrial plot in Narela. With DDA circulars now applicable to respondent no.2, the court permitted a fresh application, requested credit of the earlier deposit with reasonable interest, expeditious decision, and liberty to pursue remedies.

What the court decided

AI extract

Smt Pratibha Khatri and Anr. Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors. — Land Acquisition | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~44

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 12519/2023

¶4

SMT PRATIBHA KHATRI AND ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Ravin Rao, Mr. Akshit Sawal, Mr. Ayan Sharma, Advs.

¶5

versus

¶6

GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Mehak Nakra (ASC) along with Mr. Aditya Goyal, Ms. Gunjan Goyal, Advs. for R-1

¶7

Mr. Anuj Chaturvedi, Ms. Richa Dhawan, Ms. Harshita Maheshwari, Mr. Pawan Karan Deo, Advs. for DSIIDC

¶8

Mr. Anish Dhingra, Mr. Nakul Ahuja for R-3

¶9

CORAM:

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA O R D E R % 15.01.2025 1. The present petition assails an order dated 17.02.2020 passed by the respondent no.2 whereby the petitioner’s application for conversion (from leasehold to freehold) of its industrial plot bearing no. H-1446, land measuring 350 SQ. mtrs., situated in the layout plan of Narela Industrial Complex, Narela, Delhi-110040, has been rejected.

¶11

The petitioners also seek that the respondent no.2 be directed to refund the conversion charges paid by the petitioner amounting to Rs. 18,08,286/along with 15% interest per annum from the date of its payment till date of refund.

¶12

In the counter-affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent no.2, it has been averred as under:-

¶13

“14. That at the time of rejection of the conversion application of the Petitioners the aforesaid Circulars of DDA were not made

¶14

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 15:33:26

¶15

applicable to the Respondent No.2 That, however, subsequently, the Hon’ble Lieutenant Governor has given his consent for adoption of aforesaid circulars for the purpose of processing conversion applications for conversion from leasehold to freehold and the same has been circulated vide Circular dated 18.09.2023. That copy of Circular dated 18.09.2023 is annexed herewith as Annexure R-4”

¶16

Accordingly, learned counsel for respondent no.2 submits that in terms of the extant policy which has now been made applicable to the respondent no.2, it is possible to consider the petitioner’s request for conversion of plot from leasehold to freehold, if the petitioners chooses to exercise that option.

¶17

After some hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks to file a fresh application with the respondent no.2 for conversion of the plot from leasehold to freehold. He further requests that since an amount of Rs. 18,08,286/- has been deposited with the respondent no.2 since 28.03.2012, for the purpose of the application proposed to be filed by the petitioners, credit of the said amount, along with reasonable interest thereon for the period for which the amount has remained deposited with the respondent no.2, be granted to the petitioners. Prima facie, the said contention appears to be reasonable. The concerned authority is requested to consider the said request, and also take an expeditious decisions on the application proposed to be filed by the petitioners for conversion of the aforesaid plot from leasehold to freehold.

¶18

The present petition is disposed of in the above terms.

¶19

It is made clear that if the petitioners are aggrieved by the outcome of the aforesaid exercise, they shall be at liberty to avail appropriate remedies under law.

¶20

SACHIN DATTA, J

¶21

JANUARY 15, 2025/uk

¶22

Smt Pratibha Khatri and Anr. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Smt Pratibha Khatri and Anr. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pragati Defence Systems Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India & Ors.

M/S Hyderabad Cable Digital Service Pvt. Ltd. Vs Zee Entertainment Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.

Sewa Ram Vs New Delhi Municipal Council & Anr.

Sanrok Enterpreses Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 28 (1) Delhi

Prakash Industries Limited Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 30, Delhi & Anr.

M/S Royal Security Services Vs Jaipal Singh and Ors.

Fci Handling Workers Union Vs UOI & Anr.

Rajesh Gomes Vs New Delhi Municipal Council (Ndmc) and Ors.

M/S Hyderabad Cable Digital Service Pvt. Ltd. Vs Zee Entertainment Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.

Pmi Electro Mobility Solutions Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India

Devendra Kumar Gupta Vs Igl through through Cmd

Imtiaz Ali Vs the Government of NCT (Gnct) Delhi & Ors.

Yogesh Kathunia Vs Union of India and Ors.

Prashant Reddy T Vs Cpio, Indian Council for Medical Research