Petitioners' grievance over unauthorized encroachment was resolved after removal of the encroachment; the writ petition was withdrawn with liberty to re-approach if encroachment recurs.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach again if encroachment recurs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~39
versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
& ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Katyal, Standing Counsel with Ms. Ritika Bansal, Advocates for DDA. Mr. N.K. Aggarwla, SPC with Ms. Sanjana Antil, Advocate for R2.
Ms. Mahamaya Chatterjee, Govt. Pleader and Mr. Akash Dubey, Advocate for UOI.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN
O R D E R % 08.04.2025
VIKAS MAHAJAN, J
APRIL 8, 2025/ jg
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/04/2025 at 14:08:35
Ratan Lal Gajmoti & Anr.
Delhi Development Authority
R2
UOI
Vikas Mahajan
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
