Income-tax writ petition by an assessee against the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax. Counsel sought leave to withdraw the petition to pursue remedies available in law; the petition and pending application were dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~103
.....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Paritosh Jain, Mr. Divyansh Jain and Mr. Abhishek Jain, Advs.
versus
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 19(1), DELHI
.....Respondent Through: Mr. Puneet Rai, SSC with Mr. Ashvini Kumar, Mr. Rishabh Nangia and Ms. Gibran, JSC
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR
O R D E R % 21.08.2025
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
VINOD KUMAR, J
AUGUST 21, 2025 ss
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/08/2025 at 12:52:30
PRET STUDY BY JANAK FASHIONS PRIVATE LIMITED
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 19(1), DELHI
V. KAMESWAR RAO
VINOD KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
