Writ petition withdrawn by counsel at the threshold; the court disposed of the petition as withdrawn without deciding any substantive issue.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~30
LAC VIRENDER CHOUDHARY THROUGH HIS WIFE SMT SURATA DEVI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Durgesh Kumar Sharma, Adv.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Syed Abdul Haseeb, CGSC with Mr. Anis, Mr. Tabish Zia and Mr. Wahid Mashaal, Advs. with Anisul Haque, GP
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA
ORDER (ORAL) % 08.08.2025
C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
1. Mr. Sharma seeks leave to withdraw this writ petition.
2. The petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J.
AUGUST 8, 2025/ AR
W.P. (C) 11942/2025 Page 1 of 1
Lac Virender Choudhary through his wife Smt Surata Devi
Union of India and Ors
C. Hari Shankar
Om Prakash Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
