Dismissed¶20

Dr Mehul Tyagi v. All India Institute of Medical Science

Delhi HC8 Aug 2025W.P.(C)/11926/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

AIIMS SRD-CET July 2025 Session; EWS category versus UR category candidature; Senior Resident/Senior Demonstrator three-year tenure appointment; writ of certiorari and mandamus; maintainability before High Court versus Central Administrative Tribunal; Section 14 Central Administrative Tribunal Act; AIIMS notified under CAT Act; petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach CAT; advertisement dated 27.06.2025; Delhi High Court; Justice Vikas Mahajan; notice no.293/225 dated 02.08.2025.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal; no relief granted on the EWS/UR categorisation claim. ¶20

Dr Mehul Tyagi Vs All India Institute of Medical Science — Delhi HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~120

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 11926/2025 & CM APPL. 48549/2025 DR MEHUL TYAGI .....Petitioner

¶4

Through: Mr. K.K. Tyagi and Ms. Garima Tyagi, Advs.

¶5

versus

¶6

ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCE.....Respondent

¶7

Through: Appearance not given.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN O R D E R

¶10

% 08.08.2025

¶11

The present petition has been filed seeking following relief:

¶12

a) issue a writ of certiorari for quashing of quashing of notice no.293/225 dated 02.08.2025 and communication dated 04^th august, 2025 whereby the petitioner's candidature is directed to be considered under UR category instead of EWS category for SRD-CET- July 2025 Session;

¶13

b) issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ/ order or directions to the respondent directing the respondents to consider the candidature of the petitioner under EWS category; And

¶14

At the outset of the learned counsel for the respondent/AIIMS invites attention of the Court to the advertisement dated 27.06.2025 to contend that controversy involved in the present petition is with regard to the appointment of petitioner as Senior Resident/Senior Demonstrator for a tenure period of three years.

¶15

He submits that since the matter pertains to an appointment, it falls in

¶16

This is a digitally signed order.

¶17

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/08/2025 at 12:59:55

¶18

the category of service, therefore, the petitioner ought to have approached the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), as AIIMS is notified under Section 14 of the Central Administrative Tribunal Act.

¶19

Faced with this situation, Mr. K.K.Tyagi, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition to approach the learned Central Administrative Tribunal.

¶20

Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid.

¶21

VIKAS MAHAJAN, J

¶22

AUGUST 8, 2025/dss

¶23

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/08/2025 at 12:59:55

Dr Mehul Tyagi v. All India Institute of Medical Science

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr Mehul Tyagi v. All India Institute of Medical Science

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Balaji Leather Exports Prop Rakesh Kumar Agarwal Vs Sales Tax Officer Class 2 and Anr.

Captain Harsha Mahendra Vs Alliance Air Aviation Limited & Anr.

Great River Coy Private Limited Vs Coal India Limited and Ors.

Ropas Logistics Private Limited Vs Coal India Limited & Ors.

Guddi Devi & Anr. Vs Union of India & Ors.

Sheela Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Jnrb International LLP Vs Commissioner of Customs

Virender Kumar Chopra Vs Raj Kumar Prop

Ch. Veer Bhan Singh Anita Devi Mahavidyalaya Vs National Council for Teacher Education & Anr.

Ies College of Education Vs National Council for Teacher Education and Anr.

Mahendra Rana Vs Mr. Tej Pal Rana & Ors.

Shri Sadanand Private Industrial Training Institute Vs Directorate General of Training

Shivraam Dew Vs Union of India & Anr.

M/S Modern Construction Corpor Vs D.D.A.