Writ petition seeking disposal of a representation dated 18 December 2024 under Section 129 of the BSF Act. Respondents undertook to decide it within four weeks and communicate the decision. Petition disposed of accordingly.
Respondents to dispose of the Section 129 BSF Act representation within four weeks and communicate the decision to the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~78
KUSHAL DAS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhay Kumar Bhargava, Mr. Satyaarth Sinha, Ms. Khushi, Advs.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anshuman, SPC and Mr. Vidur Dwivedi, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA
ORDER (ORAL)
%
06.08.2025
C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
1. The only prayer of the petitioner in this writ petition is for the respondents to take a decision on representation dated 18 December 2024 filed under Section 129 of the BSF Act.
2. Learned Counsel for the respondents, on instructions, undertakes to ensure that the representation is disposed of within a period of four weeks from today.
3. The decision as and when taken would be communicated forthwith to the petitioner.
W.P.(C) 11715/2025
Page 1 of 2
4. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly.
C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J.
AUGUST 6, 2025 dsn
W.P.(C) 11715/2025
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondents can be directed to decide the petitioner's representation dated 18 December 2024 filed under Section 129 of the BSF Act.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kushal Das
Union of India & Ors.
C. Hari Shankar
Om Prakash Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
