Single Judge disposed of a writ petition by relying on directions of a previous Division Bench order, applying the terms of prior connected writ petitions pending with a specific limitation. No substantive judgment was delivered. The court did not issue any relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~102
CHAUDHARY JAGDISH SINGH SUDHIR SINGH
MAHAVIDYALAYA .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Mayank Manish, Mr. Ravi Kant and Mr. Vineet Upadhyay, Advs.
versus
NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION ANR ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Hardik Rupal, Adv. for NCTE.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN
O R D E R % 09.09.2025
“a. issue an appropriate writ(s) or order(s) or direction(s) directing the respondents to provide an online link for submission of application by the petitioner institution seeking grant of recognition for running the teacher training courses namely D.El.Ed. from the ensuing academic session in terms of Regulations, 2014; and / or”
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/09/2025 at 12:07:48
of petitioner submits that this Court has earlier passed an order on 06.12.2024 in W.P.(C) 7537/2024 granting the relief to the petitioner in terms of yet another order dated 21.12.2023 passed in W.P.(C) 16610/2023. 4. Mr. Rupal submits that he has no objection in case similar order in terms of order dated 21.12.2023 is passed in the present case subject to the outcome of the LPA 507/2022.
2. Issue notice.
3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents accepts notice.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties jointly submit that the controversy involved in the instant case stands covered by order dated 15.09.2023 passed in W.P.(C) 12125/2023 and other connected matters.
5. The order dated 15.09.2023 reads as under:-
3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties, however, submit that on 31.01.2023, on an application filed by the petitioner-institution, the order passed by the Hon’ble Division Bench in LPA 507/2022 on 18.11.2022 has been recalled. According to them, the Hon’ble Division Bench has expressed to decide the matter in LPA itself.
4. Having considered the aforesaid submissions made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties, it would be apposite to dispose of the instant petitions in similar terms of W.P.(C) 2813/2021 dated 24.08.2022 and by subsequent order dated 31.08.2022.
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/09/2025 at 12:07:48
5. Needless to state that if the order dated 24.08.2022, passed in W.P.(C) 2813/2021 is modified or set aside in pending LPA 507/2022, the same would govern the further course of action.
6. With aforesaid directions, the instant petitions stand disposed of alongwith pending application(s), if any.”
6. In view of the aforesaid, let the directions passed by this Court in W.P.(C) 12125/2023 be made applicable mutatis mutandis in the instant case also.
7. Accordingly, the instant petition stands disposed of.”
VIKAS MAHAJAN, J
SEPTEMBER 9, 2025 N.S. ASWAL
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/09/2025 at 12:07:48
CHAUDHARY JAGDISH SINGH SUDHIR SINGH MAHAVIDYALAYA
NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION
VIKAS MAHAJAN
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
