The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition dealing with DDA employees' service conditions and terminal benefits as withdrawn on the Petitioner's application to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal instead.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~25
Through: Mr. Pawan Kawrani, Mr. Ankur Aggarwal, Mr. Aashutosh Deol and Mr. Harshit Bansal, Advs.
versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY .....Respondent Through: Ms. Sriparna Chatterjee, Adv. for DDA.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN
O R D E R % 09.07.2025
VIKAS MAHAJAN, J
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/07/2025 at 13:38:52
JULY 9, 2025/ N.S. ASWAL
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/07/2025 at 13:38:52
Dhani Ram
Delhi Development Authority
Vikas Mahajan
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
