Respondent No.2 in a writ petition moved under Section 151 CPC seeking vacation of an interim order of DRAT Delhi or urgent hearing of its appeal. The application was not pressed and was disposed of with liberty to seek appropriate remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~150
Through: Mr. Akshay Chandra, Mr. Aditya Malhotra, Mr. Prateek Gupta and Mr. Karan Malhotra, Advocates.
versus CANARA BANK & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Yogesh Kumar Jagia, Mr. Amit Sood, Mr. Mohit Gupta and Mr. Tarun Dev, Advocates for R2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH O R D E R % 11.12.2025
CM APPL. 78446/2025
<i. Call for the records of appeal no. No.56/2025 titled; Rajesh Gupta Vs Canara Bank and Ors. pending before DRAT Delhi and pass an order vacating interim order dated 18/07/2025 passed by DRAT New Delhi in appeal no. No.56/2025 (supra) which is continuation of order dated 08/07/2025 passed by this Hon'ble Court in the captioned writ petition.
ii. Or in alternative pass direction to DRAT New Delhi to list and hear the appeal No.56/2025 titled; Rajesh Gupta Vs Canara Bank and Ors. on urgent basis by giving day to day hearing.=
JYOTI SINGH, J
DECEMBER 11, 2025/YA
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/12/2025 at 13:08:32
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rajesh Gupta
Canara Bank
Respondent No.2
Jyoti Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
