Dismissed
Ritika Juneja v. Anshuman Narang
Delhi HCTR.P.(CRL.)/49/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petition dismissed as infructuous because it had already been decided.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~4
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- TR.P.(CRL.) 49/2024, CRL.M.A. 14820/2024, CRL.M.A.
¶4
14821/2024
¶5
RITIKA JUNEJA .....Petitioner
¶6
Through: Mr. M. C. Dhingra, Mr. Piyush Kant Roy, Mr. Gaurav Dhingra, Mr. Kunal Verma, Advs.
¶7
versus
¶8
ANSHUMAN NARANG .....Respondent Through: None.
¶9
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
¶10
O R D E R % 24.07.2024
¶11
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the petition has already been decided, the present petition has become infructuous.
¶12
In view of the submissions made, the present petition along with pending application stands dismissed as infructuous.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Ritika Juneja
- respondent
Anshuman Narang
Coram
AI extract
Dinesh Kumar Sharma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court