Disposed
State v. Mritunjay Roy and Ors.
Delhi HCTR.P.(CRL.)/8/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Single judge order transferring a criminal case from Patiala House Courts to Rouse Avenue Courts pursuant to a lower court's direction regarding Police Act proceedings.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~78
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- TR.P.(CRL.) 8/2024
¶4
STATE ..... Petitioner
¶5
Through: Ms. Shubhi Gupta, APP for State with Insp. Amit Pratap, P.S. EOW.
¶6
versus
¶7
MRITUNJAY ROY AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Trilok Singh, Advocate for accused Mrityunjay Roy. Mr. Akshay Dahiya for accused Harmenn Sabherwal. Mr. Deepak Kumar Gupta, Advocate for accused Vinod Kumar Sharma.
¶8
- Mr. D.K. Pandey, Advocate for accused Pawan Kumar Rai.
¶9
CORAM:
¶10
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH
¶11
O R D E R % 22.01.2024
¶12
- This petition has been placed before Court pursuant to a communication dated 15.01.2024, received from the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi, seeking transfer of case titled ‘State Vs. Mritunjay Roy, FIR No. 56/2022, PS EOW, under Sections 406/420/467/471/120B IPC’ to Rouse Avenue Courts. The communication has been sent pursuant to an order dated 04.01.2024 passed by Ms. Nabeela Wali, learned CMM, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
State
- respondent
Mritunjay Roy and Ors.
Coram
AI extract
Jyoti Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court