Petitioner sought withdrawal of a testamentary case under Section 151 CPC. The court allowed the withdrawal application and dismissed the case as withdrawn, cancelling the date already fixed.
Permission to withdraw the case granted; case dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~40
RAJESH LATHIGARA .....Petitioner
Through: Mr Kamal Mehta, Advocate along with petitioner in person.
versus
THE STATE & ORS. .....Respondents Through:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN
O R D E R
% 26.09.2024
I.A. 40545/2024 ( by the petitioner under Section 151 CPC seeking permission to withdraw the present case )
TEST.CAS. 62/2024
VIKAS MAHAJAN, J
SEPTEMBER 26, 2024/MK
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 07:00:25
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rajesh Lathigara
The State
Vikas Mahajan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
