The High Court of Delhi dismissed a suit for partition after the plaintiff withdrew it. The property had been sold and proceeds apportioned by mutual settlement among the parties, rendering the suit unnecessary.
Suit dismissed as withdrawn; all pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~15
Through: Ms. Amita Singh Kalkal, Adv.
versus
UMA PATI SOOD & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Chaitanya Rohilla, Adv. for D-1. Mr. Rachit Gumber and Ms. Divyanshu Rathi, Advs. for D-2 & 3.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN O R D E R % 27.09.2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/10/2024 at 12:10:17
respective shares.
VIKAS MAHAJAN, J
SEPTEMBER 27, 2024/dss
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/10/2024 at 12:10:17
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the plaintiff's suit for partition should be dismissed upon withdrawal following a settlement of the property by sale.
VIKAS MAHAJAN
As recorded by the court registry
A civil suit filed on the original side of a High Court exercising ordinary original civil jurisdiction.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
