Second appeal where counsel reported both appellants deceased and their son uninterested in pursuing the matter; the appeal was dismissed with liberty to legal representatives to seek revival.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~8
S.P SHARMA & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Piyush Sharma, Mr. Shivam Dubey and Mr. Anuj Kumar Sharma, Advs.
versus
R.K AGGARWAL & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Shiv Nath Sawhnay, Adv.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
%
O R D E R 03.05.2024
1. Mr. Piyush Sharma, learned counsel for the appellant submits that neither of the appellants is surviving and though he has attempted to contact the son of the appellant, he does not seem to be interested in pursuing the matter.
2. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed with liberty to legal representatives of the appellants, should they be interested, to move an appropriate application for revival.
C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
MAY 3, 2024 pb
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/05/2024 at 11:17:12
S.P Sharma & Anr
R.K Aggarwal & Anr
C. Hari Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
