The Delhi High Court allowed the withdrawal of the appeal by the appellants as the parties had entered into a settlement, thereby dismissing the appeal.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~44
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA(COMM) 76/2024
..... APPELLANTS Through: Mr.Deepak Diwan, Mr.Sagar Tanwar, and Ms.Rinki, Advocates.
versus
UNION BANK OF INDIA
..... RESPONDENT Through: Mr.Rupak Srivastava, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU O R D E R
% 15.05.2024
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
TARA VITASTA GANJU, J
MAY 15, 2024 M
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/05/2024 at 11:39:00
KRISHAN LAL KATHURIA & ANR.
UNION BANK OF INDIA
VIBHU BAKHRU
TARA VITASTA GANJU
As recorded by the court registry
A first appeal against a decree of a Commercial Court under the Commercial Courts Act 2015.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
