Disposed

M/S Kumarsons Auto Pvt. Ltd. v. Darshan Kumar Arora

Delhi HC8 Oct 2024RFA(COMM)/431/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Commercial appeal against a decree of possession and mesne profits for a suit property. With the respondent's consent, appeal disposed of by granting time till 30.06.2025 to hand over vacant possession, subject to payment of arrears, mesne profits and utility charges and an affidavit of undertaking.

What did the court decide?

Time till 30.06.2025 to appellant to hand over vacant possession, subject to paying arrears/mesne profits and filing undertaking; decree not executable till then.

M/S Kumarsons Auto Pvt. Ltd. Vs Darshan Kumar Arora — Landlord and Tenant | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~48

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- RFA(COMM) 431/2024 M/S KUMARSONS AUTO PVT LTD .....Appellant Through: Dr. (Maj) J C Vashista, Adv.

¶4

versus

¶5

DARSHAN KUMAR ARORA .....Respondent Through: Mr.Rajiv Mehra, Adv. along with the respondent in person.

¶6

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE O R D E R

¶7

% 08.10.2024

¶8

CAV 505/2024

¶9

Since learned counsel for the caveator/respondent enters appearance, the caveat stands discharged.

¶10

CM APPL. 59618/2024

¶11

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶12

The application stands disposed of.

¶13

RFA(COMM) 431/2024 & CM APPL. 59617/2024 (stay)

¶14

The present appeal under Section 13 (1A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 read with Order XLI Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeks to assail the judgment and decree dated 05.08.2024 passed by the learned District Judge (Comm.), Central, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in CS (COMM) No.1553/2023. Vide the impugned order, the learned Trial Court has passed a decree of possession of the suit property in favour of the respondent. The learned Trial Court has

¶15

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 06:28:36

¶16

also directed the appellant to pay arrears of a sum of Rs.36,600/- and continue to pay mesne profits @ Rs.4,500/- per month. Further, the appellant has also been directed that in case, he delays in making the said payment, he will be liable to pay interest @ 12% p.a.

¶17

After some arguments, leaned counsel for the appellant on instructions from the appellant prays for some reasonable time to vacate the suit property.

¶18

Learned counsel for the respondent, who appears on advance notice, submits that he has no objection to some reasonable time being granted to the appellant subject to the appellant filing an affidavit of undertaking to handover the vacant possession of the suit property to the respondent within the time as may be granted by this Court.

¶19

In the light of the aforesaid stand taken by the parties, we dispose of the appeal by granting the appellant time till 30.06.2025 to hand over the peaceful and vacant possession of the suit property to the respondent. This would, however, be subject to the appellant paying the pending arrears of rent/mesne profits in terms of the impugned order to the respondent within four weeks from today and continuing to pay mesne profits as also the up-to-date electricity and water charges in terms of the impugned order till the handing over of the peaceful and vacant possession of the suit property to the respondent. An affidavit of undertaking in this regard will be filed by the appellant within three weeks.

¶20

The appeal is, accordingly, disposed of by making it clear that this Court has found no merit in the appellant’s challenge to the impugned order and therefore, subject to the appellant filing an undertaking in

¶21

¶22

terms of this order, the impugned judgment and decree will not be executable till 30.06.2025.

¶23

REKHA PALLI, J

¶24

SAURABH BANERJEE, J

¶25

OCTOBER 8, 2024 kk

¶26

M/S Kumarsons Auto Pvt. Ltd. v. Darshan Kumar Arora

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Kumarsons Auto Pvt. Ltd. v. Darshan Kumar Arora

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs Transline Technologies Ltd.

M/S. Maheshwari Box and Lamination & Anr. Vs M/S. Vason Printopack Pvt. Ltd.

M/S Sagar Ratna Restaurants Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S Abm Communication Pvt. Ltd.

Central Govt Employeesconsumer Cooperative Society Ltd. Vs Sgt Sanjeev Kumar

M/S L a Collection Vs M/S Vishal Textile

Sunit Ashar and Company Vs Bausch and Lomb India Private Limited

Rajiv Kumar Vs Jawahar Lal Vohra

Shri Vijay Kumar Gupta Vs Shri Mohit Malik

Lata Chauhan Vs Ls Bisht & Ors.

Sumanshu Ashta Vs Komal

Nodira Davlatova Vs Siddharth Nayyar

Bajaj Finance Ltd. Vs Davnider Kumar Sharma and Others

Jahnavi Dugal Vs Paresh Dandona