Allowed
Lata Chauhan v. Ls Bisht & Ors.
Delhi HCRFA(OS)/71/2010
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Respondent no. 11 applied for release of funds by submitting documents under a slightly different name ('Neelam Parihar') than recorded in the memo of parties ('Neelam Parhar'). The court verified identity documents and allowed the application, directing the registry to release the amount to the correct name.
What did the court decide?
Direction to the Registry to release the amount of Rs. 73,50,000/- to respondent no. 11 by accepting documents in the name 'Ms. Neelam Parihar'.