The court allowed the appellant to withdraw the appeal. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn and pending applications were closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~13
M/S MH TEXTILE PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr Kartavya Batra, Advocate
versus
SEEMA AGARWAL ..... Respondent Through: None.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER HON’BLE MR JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
O R D E R % 02.07.2024 [Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
AMIT BANSAL, J
JULY 2, 2024/ PB
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 06:29:21
M/S MH TEXTILE PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS.
SEEMA AGARWAL
Rajiv Shakdher
Amit Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
A first appeal against a decree of a Commercial Court under the Commercial Courts Act 2015.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
