Wife appealed a Family Court order in matrimonial proceedings, alleging inadequate time to lead evidence despite the husband's evidence running five years. Counsel conceded a Supreme Court direction to complete proceedings within six months and withdrew the appeal with liberty to seek other remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~4
Through: Mr Abhinav Bajaj with Ms Geetashi Chandna and Mr Samsham Ojha, Advs.
versus
ASHISH GHAI ..... Respondent
Through: None.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
[Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]
CM Appl.35830/2024
MAT.APP.(F.C.) 201/2024 & CM Appl.35831/2024
3.1 It is submitted by the counsel for the appellant/wife that some leeway was sought on account of the appellant’s/wife’s ill health.
MAT.APP.(F.C.) 201/2024 ½
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/07/2024 at 15:04:58
3.2 That said, counsel for the appellant/wife concedes that in a Transfer Petition preferred by the appellant/wife, the Supreme Court, while refusing to grant relief, had directed the Family Court to complete the proceedings within six (6) months from the date of its order.
AMIT BANSAL, J
JULY 1, 2024 /pmc
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
MAT.APP.(F.C.) 201/2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/07/2024 at 15:04:58
Shweta Chugh Ghai
Ashish Ghai
Rajiv Shakdher
Amit Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act 1984 against a decree or order of a Family Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
