Dismissed

Mange Ram (Deceased) Thr Lrs v. Rakesh Sharma & Ors.

Delhi HC27 Sept 2024RFA/431/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Delhi High Court dismissed two revision appeals and connected applications for non-prosecution. The order noted deaths of appellants and respondents without completion of substitution procedures, leading to dismissal along with pending applications.

What did the court decide?

Appeals RFA 296/2019 and RFA 431/2019 alongwith pending applications dismissed for non-prosecution.

Mange Ram (Deceased) Thr Lrs Vs Rakesh Sharma… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~4 & 5

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- RFA 296/2019, CM APPL. 16013/2019, CM APPL. 51146/2019 & CM APPL. 51147/2019

¶4

MANGE RAM ( SINCE DECEASED) THR LRS & ANR .....Appellants Through: None. versus

¶5

RAM RATI & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Om Prakash and Mr. Pankaj Kumar Yadav, Advocates for R-1.

¶6

- RFA 431/2019, CM APPL. 21758/2019, CM APPL. 53629/2019 & CM APPL. 53630/2019

¶7

MANGE RAM (DECEASED) THR LRS .....Appellant Through: None. versus RAKESH SHARMA & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Om Prakash and Mr. Pankaj Kumar Yadav, Advocates for R-4 & 5.

¶8

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

¶9

O R D E R % 27.09.2024

¶10

RFA 296/2019, CM APPL. 16013/2019, CM APPL. 51146/2019 & CM APPL. 51147/2019

¶11

RFA 431/2019, CM APPL. 21758/2019, CM APPL. 53629/2019& CM APPL. 53630/2019

¶12

RFA 296/2019 & connected matter

¶13

Page 1 of 2

¶14

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 05:51:39

¶15

By order dated 16.01.2023, it was recorded that learned counsel for the appellants was discharged and it was directed that Court notice would be issued to the legal representatives of the original appellant.

¶16

In RFA 296/2019, the Registry reports that appellant Nos. 1 (a), (b), (d), (e) and (f) have been served and appellant No. 1 (c) has died. Learned counsel for respondent No. 1, states that appellant No. 2 and respondent No. 2 have also died, and no further steps for substitution have been taken.

¶17

In RFA 431/2019, the Registry reports that appellant No. 1(a) has expired and appellant Nos. 1(b) – (f) have been served. Learned counsel for respondent Nos. 4 and 5 states that respondent No. 2 has also died, and no steps have been taken for substitution of the deceased appellant or the deceased respondent.

¶18

In these circumstances, the appeals, alongwith pending applications, are dismissed for non-prosecution.

¶19

PRATEEK JALAN, J

¶20

SEPTEMBER 27, 2024/ MR/

¶21

RFA 296/2019 & connected matter

¶22

Page 2 of 2

¶23

Mange Ram (Deceased) Thr Lrs v. Rakesh Sharma & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mange Ram (Deceased) Thr Lrs v. Rakesh Sharma & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bajinder Singh Rana Vs Dhanraj

M/S M Cars Studio & Anr. Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Dhaba Estd 1986 Delhi Vs New Delhi Municipal Council

Sateshwari Bharti Vs Maya Devi & Ors.

Ravinder Soni Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi and Others

Mange Ram ( Since Deceased) Thr Lrs & Anr. Vs Ram Rati & Ors.