Dismissed
Bajinder Singh Rana v. Dhanraj
Delhi HCRFA/164/2019
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The Court dismissed the First Appeal for non-prosecution as the appellant failed to appear despite sufficient opportunities and service of court notice.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~15
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- RFA 164/2019 & CM APPL. 8959/2019
¶4
BAJINDER SINGH RANA .....Appellant Through: None.
¶5
versus
¶6
DHANRAJ .....Respondent Through: None.
¶7
CORAM:
¶8
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
¶9
O R D E R % 26.09.2024
¶10
- There is no appearance on behalf of the parties when the matter is taken up for hearing.
¶11
- Court notice was issued by an order dated 04.01.2023. It was noted in the order dated 22.08.2023 that the appellant has been served. However, there has been no appearance on behalf of the appellant on 22.08.2023, 28.11.2023, 15.04.2024 even after service of Court notice. As recorded in the order dated 22.08.2023, fresh court notice was directed to be served upon the appellant, which has also been served. The matter was listed twice thereafter, but no appearance was recorded on behalf of the appellant even on those dates. The appellant is not represented today either.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
BAJINDER SINGH RANA
- respondent
DHANRAJ
Coram
AI extract
Prateek Jalan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court