Dismissed
Rajan Kapoor v. Rakesh Sharma
Delhi HCRFA/340/2008
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Regular First Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution after five consecutive dates on which neither party appeared despite the matter being called out.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~R-54
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- RFA 340/2008
¶4
RAJAN KAPOOR .....Appellant
¶5
Through: None.
¶6
versus
¶7
RAKESH SHARMA .....Respondent Through: None.
¶8
CORAM:
¶9
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
¶10
O R D E R % 03.12.2024
¶11
- None has appeared for the parties despite the matter being called out on various dates i.e., 05.11.2024, 12.11.2024, 19.11.2024 and 25.11.2024.
¶12
- The daily cause list published on the website of this Court clearly reflects a note for advocates and litigants that regular matters mentioned in the cause list shall be taken up after the supplementary and advance list is over. The physical display Board of this Court as well as the virtual display Board also clearly reflects that regular matters are being called and taken up for hearing.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Rajan Kapoor
- respondent
Rakesh Sharma
Coram
AI extract
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court