Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution as appellant failed to appear on multiple consecutive dates, misusing judicial time and resources.
Appeal and pending application(s) dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~R-2
TRIM INDIA P.LTD.
.....Appellant
Through: None.
versus
AVON TUBETECH P.LTD.
.....Respondent
Through: Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Adv.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
O R D E R % 03.12.2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/12/2024 at 12:59:58
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
DECEMBER 03, 2024/P
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/12/2024 at 12:59:58
Trim India P.Ltd.
Avon Tubetech P.Ltd.
Pusurshindra Kumar Kaurav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
