An appeal by the appellant was listed on multiple occasions. The appellant failed to appear or was not heard when represented by counsel on previous dates. On the date of this order, no appearance was made by the appellant. The court found the appellant uninterested in prosecuting the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3
ANIL KUMAR .....Appellant
Through: None
versus
CHAMAN KUMAR & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Anuradha Mittra, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
TARA VITASTA GANJU, J
SEPTEMBER 20, 2024/pa Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 05:35:48
Anil Kumar
Tara Vitasta Ganju
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
