Writ petition disposed of after the petitioner and Respondent No.1 settled their disputes through mediation by a Settlement Agreement dated 22.08.2024; the settlement amount was paid and the petition was disposed of in terms of the settlement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~10
Through: Mr. Malak Bhatt, Adv. with Ms.Nitya Prabhakar and Ms. Sukanya Joshi, Advs.
LAKHMI CHAND & ANR. .....Respondents Through: None for R-1. Ms. Zehra Khan, Adv. with Ms. Anauntta Shankar, Adv. for R-2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
2.1 The statement of the learned Counsel for the Petitioner is taken on record. The Respondent No.2 is bound down to the statement made by its Counsel.
TARA VITASTA GANJU, J
SEPTEMBER 20, 2024/SA
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 08:42:43
White Fox Support Services Pvt Ltd
Lakhmi Chand
Anr.
Tara Vitasta Ganju
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
