Dismissed
Kapil Jain v. Ram Kishor Mann
Delhi HCRFA/162/2016
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The court dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution as the appellant failed to appear despite multiple calls for hearing.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~R-12
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- RFA 162/2016 KAPIL JAIN .....Appellant
¶4
Through: None.
¶5
versus RAM KISHOR MANN .....Respondent Through: None.
¶6
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R % 17.09.2024
¶7
- None has appeared for the appellant despite the matter is called out in second round.
¶8
- None had appeared on 19.07.2024, 30.07.2024, 20.08.2024 and 09.09.2024.
¶9
- The appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
¶10
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
¶11
SEPTEMBER 17, 2024/P
¶12
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/09/2024 at 11:58:56
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Kapil Jain
- respondent
Ram Kishor Mann
Coram
AI extract
Purushindra Kumar Kaurav
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court