Dismissed
Devanand v. Khem Raj & Anr.
Delhi HCRFA/156/2016
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Regular first appeal dismissed for want of prosecution as the appellant failed to appear despite the matter being called out repeatedly over several dates.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~R-10
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- RFA 156/2016 & CM APPL 4512/2018 DEVANAND .....Appellant
¶4
Through: None.
¶5
versus
¶6
KHEM RAJ & ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Sakshi Tanwar, Adv.
¶7
CORAM:
¶8
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R % 17.09.2024
¶9
- None has appeared for the appellant despite the matter is called out in second round.
¶10
- None had appeared on 19.07.2024, 30.07.2024, 20.08.2024, and 09.09.2024.
¶11
- The appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
¶12
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
DEVANAND
- respondent
KHEM RAJ
- other
ANR
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court